Constructivism and constructionism

Lecture 1 (23/03/2023)

The fir­st two arti­cles that I ask you to read aim to fra­me the con­cep­ts of constructiVism (the V word) and constructioNism (the N word).

Once you have read the fir­st two arti­cles, I ask you to take a look at the­se arti­cles writ­ten by Papert. They are light arti­cles whe­re you can find some of his most famous expressions.

Finally, we should have a look at the work of Mitch Resnick, the crea­tor of Scratch:

Points for reasoning/discussion:

  • What are the “gears of your chil­d­hood”? Do you remem­ber epi­so­des of signi­fi­cant lear­ning moti­va­ted by your par­ti­cu­lar interests?
  • For tho­se who are used to tal­king about algo­ri­thms, theo­rems, and proofs, much of the con­tent of the­se arti­cles may seem like high-level chat­ter. We expect a more pre­ci­se set of instruc­tions, such as “How do I bring the­se con­cep­ts into the clas­sroom?” I ask you: 
    • Can you iden­ti­fy metho­do­lo­gies and sug­ge­stions taken from the­se tex­ts that can be imme­dia­te­ly applied?
    • Can you iden­ti­fy broa­der metho­do­lo­gies and suggestions?
    • Can you tell us about any signi­fi­cant exam­ples of tea­chers who, even uncon­sciou­sly, fol­lo­wed this school of thought?
    • What is your opi­nion on Papert’s thinking?
  • I would also like you to reflect on Papert’s par­ti­cu­lar sty­le regar­ding the resul­ts of his inter­ven­tions. Many anec­do­tes, no data. We will discuss this in this les­son and then return to the­se aspec­ts when we address research on com­pu­ter-based teaching.
  • Finally, I would like you to meta-reflect on the natu­re of my les­sons in light of what you have read. Am I using, or at lea­st attemp­ting to use, a con­struc­ti­vi­st approach? 
    • In this course
    • For tho­se who have taken Algorithms: in the Algorithms course.

Lecture 2 (30/03/2023)

Let’s con­ti­nue a review of con­struc­ti­vi­sm con­cep­ts, del­ving into the social per­spec­ti­ve, coo­pe­ra­ti­ve work, and learning.

Points for reasoning/discussion:

  • Can you iden­ti­fy metho­do­lo­gies and sug­ge­stions from the­se tex­ts that can be imme­dia­te­ly applied?
    Can you iden­ti­fy metho­do­lo­gies and sug­ge­stions of broa­der sco­pe?
    I would like you to reflect on the discus­sion bet­ween con­struc­ti­vi­sm and instructivism.

Material for the future

There are many rea­ding sug­ge­stions on the­se topics. Here are some as an oppor­tu­ni­ty for fur­ther study.

  • Thanks to the gene­ro­si­ty of the Papert fami­ly, the book “Mindstorms” can be free­ly downloaded.
  • There is a web­si­te, http://www.papert.org/, which col­lec­ts many of Papert’s wri­tings and inter­ven­tions. Papert’s wri­ting is some­ti­mes ram­bling, but full of “pearls”: expres­sions like “gears of my chil­d­hood,” “hard fun,” “big ideas” are all phra­ses that have beco­me famous and are relaun­ched in the work of Mitch Resnick and the Lifelong Kindergarten.
  • Thinking about Thinking about Seymour” is a work­shop dedi­ca­ted to the memo­ry of Seymour Papert, who pas­sed away in 2016. You can find the video con­tri­bu­tions of the work­shop, all very interesting.
  • The Nature of Constructionist Learning” is an onli­ne cour­se offe­red by MIT. You can find fur­ther rea­ding sug­ge­stions; in par­ti­cu­lar, les­sons 4–8 address the work of psy­cho­lo­gists and epi­ste­mo­lo­gists such as Piaget, Vygotsky, Luria, and Dewey.
 

Scroll to top